林家呈
提到農村，一些刻板印樣就會浮現，辛苦的生活方式、經濟不好、社會與教育資源的弱勢，給農村一種落後的印象。但是，當我們走踏農村之後，許多觀念開始改變，透過各種資源與條件的調查與分析，其實，農村擁有諸如土地和水等自然資源，具有生產力，除了足夠應付自己的需求外，還支持著都市的生存。面對困境，農村反而擁有足夠的生存條件。晚餐菜色是傍晚逛菜園時決定的，或是下班經過生鮮超市買來的；孩子有遊樂設施可以玩樂，或在田裡溪裡認識世界… 等等。便利與否，其實是一種選擇，一種生活方式。
Hardship, backward, bad economy, low social status and lack of educational resources are the stereotypic images people easily to have about farming villages. But as soon as we stepped into it our ideas were changed. After investigation and analysis, we realize that lands and waters are the most productive resources of farming villages, they not only support local people but also the needs of cities. Farming villages actually possess the survival power during crises. Life in farming villages is very different; dishes for dinner could be from groceries or from the yards, kids can have fun in playgrounds or in the fields and creeks. Convenient or not depends on how one looks at it.
那台灣的農村到底缺了什麼？面對未來的環境脆弱與能源挑戰，農村還是一種先天的弱勢嗎？或者說，我們需要放在未來學的角度去發現與建構農村的優勢。農村的地景構成或是生活方式中的地方智慧處處提供許多規劃設計的想像，不管多大的景觀都是「單元」所組成，回應人與土地生產的經驗，生產如此、聚落也是如此。如何透過回到農村生活，啟動各種連結機制，在土地上建構一個生活網絡，基於各項資源的重新安排，從生產到居住單元，甚至人造世界的構築材料與築構方式。
So what on earth farming villages don’t have? When the environment is more and more fragile and energy crisis is impending, are farming villages still in disadvantageous status compared to cities? Perhaps we should have a perspective of futurology so we can find and to strengthen the advantages of farming villages. Topography in rural areas and the local wisdom in commonplace inspire our design greatly. In terms of design, grand landscape can be dealt as the assemblage of “units” to respond people’s experience of living and working on these lands. On our return to farming villages we activate the connections of different functions and build a network for living. From living to production, resources of lands are rearranged, and even the materials and techniques of manmade environment are transformed.
本設計提案關注於「退休經濟」，設定了進入農村居住的條件，使用彈性的支架體和台灣慣常的構築工法為基礎，嘗試提供一套符合低造價的條件，以及能夠回應農村市街生活的期望。探討了，建築型態與構築系統如何透過設計的檢討而逐漸成熟，並且細緻討論生活中的種種共享機制下的空間緊縮策略，已有限的資源提供多樣的生活需要，並且有助於共同生活方式的發展。
This design proposal focused on the “economy of retirement” for an ideal living in farming villages. Through applying flexible frames and common building craft in Taiwan, we experimented a construction system of low costs; meanwhile, responded to people’s expectation about activities in the streets. Architectural and structural approaches got mature after reexamination on design and discussions about the spatial strategies for shared living functions. With limited resources we tried to meet diversified needs in order to sustain the development of a shared lifestyle.
0 意見:
張貼留言